Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

The journal is an international peer-reviewed publication devoted to disseminate original information contributing to the understanding and development of agroecosystems in tropical and subtropical areas.

The Journal recognizes the multidisciplinary nature of its scope and encourages the submission of original manuscripts from all of the disciplines involved in this area.

Original contributions are welcomed in relation to the study of particular components of the agroecosystems (i.e. plant, animal, soil) as well as the resulting interactions and their relationship/impact on society and environment.

The journal does not received manuscripts based solely on economic aspects, econometrics, crop production projections, food and meat science /technology and closely related subjects. 

 

 

Section Policies

Invited review

Section editors will invite researcher to submit reviews. The manuscript will be peer reviewed by the section editors and might require additional reviews.

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Review

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Agroecosystems studies


Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Research Papers

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Short Notes

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Supporting data papers

Manuscript are accepted only as companion to pappers submitted simultaneously to the journal

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Forum

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

Submitted manuscripts are subject to a single blind peer review process. A minimum of two independent evaluations is required to reach a decision on publication. 

Reviewers are selected from the journal's own database, composed of international researchers. However, authors are required to provide information (name, institution, e-mail, expertise area) of at least 2 potential reviewers from institutions different from the author's affiliation. This information will help to widen the reviewers' database. It is not guaranteed that they will use it to review any particular manuscript.

An overview of the editorial and publishing process is available at https://www.revista.ccba.uady.mx/ojs/index.php/TSA/about/aboutThisPublishingSystem

 

Publication Frequency

The journal is published 3 times per year. Issue 1 (January - April) Issue 2 (May - August) Issue 3 (September - December) 

 

 

Open Access Policy

Open Access Commitment

This journal offers free and immediate access to its content, based on the principle that making research freely available to the public fosters a greater exchange of knowledge globally.

The journal states that the metadata of its published articles is freely available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license, which permits its reuse, harvesting, and redistribution by third parties for academic and scientific purposes. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.es

  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.

 

Publication Model

The journal uses the Gold Open Access publishing model. The Article Processing Charge (APC) is used to cover the journal's maintenance costs, including hosting, plagiarism detection software, layout, and editorial support staff. The APC for this journal also subsidizes the same operating costs for its sister outreach journal, Bioagrociencias (https://www.revista.ccba.uady.mx/ojs/index.php/BAC), allowing this journal to publish under the Diamond model, thus promoting access to knowledge for the general public.

The journal waives the APC for researchers from countries classified by the UNDP-UN as having a low Human Development Index (HDI) https://hdr.undp.org/data-center/human-development-index#/indicies/HDI

 

 

Archiving

Digital Preservation Policy:

This journal uses the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archive among participating libraries, enabling them to maintain permanent archives of the journal for preservation and restoration purposes. Learn more.

Backups: Automatic and periodic backups of the entire database and server files are performed. These backups are stored on geographically separate servers, managed by the UADY's technological infrastructure, ensuring disaster recovery.

Persistent and Open Formats: The use of standard, open, and widely adopted file formats is prioritized (primarily PDF/A for articles), facilitating their future accessibility regardless of software updates.

Assignment of Persistent Identifiers (DOIs): All published articles have a DOI (Digital Object Identifier) through Crossref, guaranteeing that the link to the digital object is persistent and stable, even if the website's URL structure changes in the future.

Institutional Repository: Published articles are automatically or semi-annually deposited in the UADY Institutional Repository, ensuring a backup and additional visibility within the University's open access infrastructure.

 

Policy Updates

This policy is reviewed periodically by the Editorial Committee to ensure its alignment with international digital preservation standards.

 

Self-Archiving Policy:

 

1. Definition

Self-archiving refers to the practice whereby authors deposit a copy of their scholarly work into institutional, subject-specific (thematic), or personal repositories. This policy establishes the terms and conditions under which authors are permitted to self-archive their manuscripts.

2. Manuscript Versions

  • Preprint: The original version of the manuscript submitted to the journal, prior to the peer-review process.
  • Postprint (Accepted Manuscript): The final version of the manuscript accepted by the editorial board following peer review, prior to typesetting and layout design.
  • Published Version (Version of Record / Editorial PDF): The definitive, formatted version as it appears on the journal’s official platform.

3. Self-Archiving Conditions

3.1 Preprint

Authors are permitted to deposit the preprint version in institutional or subject-specific repositories at any time. It is requested and highly recommended that authors indicate that the manuscript has been submitted to the journal, and subsequently update the repository record once the article is formally published.

3.2 Postprint (Accepted Manuscript)

Authors may deposit the postprint version only after the article has been officially published. The repository entry must mandatorily include the full bibliographic reference and a direct link (DOI/URL) to the published Version of Record.

3.3 Published Version (Version of Record / Editorial PDF)

As this is an open-access journal, authors are fully permitted to share and deposit the final published PDF version, provided that the original source is appropriately cited and proper credit is attributed.

4. Author Obligations upon Self-Archiving

  • Clearly identify and label the specific version being deposited (preprint, postprint, or published version).
  • Accurately and formally cite the published article, ensuring proper metadata alignment with the journal.
  • Ensure the scientific content remains unaltered relative to the published Version of Record.
  • Include a permanent link (such as the DOI or stable URL) to the official version on the journal's platform.

 

Abstracted / Listed in the following services

AgBiotech News and Information, Agroforestry Abstracts, Animal Breeding Abstracts, Dairy Science Abstracts, Field Crop Abstracts, Forest Product Abstracts, Grasslands and Forage Abstracts, Horticultural Science Abstracts, Irrigation and Drainage Abstracts, LATINDEX (www.latindex.unam.mx), Maize Abstracts, Nutrition Abstracts and Reviews Series B: Livestock Feeds and Feeding, PERIODICA (dgb.unam.mx/periodica.html), Pig News and Information, Plant Breeding Abstracts, Plant Genetic Resources Abstracts, Poultry Abstracts, Review of Agricultural Entomology, Review of Aromatic and Medicinal Plants, Review of Plant Pathology, Rice Abstracts, Seed Abstracts, Soils and Fertilizers, Soybean Abstracts, Tropical Diseases Bulletin, Ulrich's, Veterinary Bulletin, Weed Abstracts, World Agricultural and Rural Sociology Abstracts

Agricultural Economics Database (formerly AgECONCD), Animal Production Database (formerly BEASTCD), Crop Science Database (formerly E-CD), Forest Science Database (formerly TREECD and ForestScience.info), Horticultural Science Database (formerly HORTCD), Plant Genetics and Breeding Database (formerly PLANTGENECD), Plant Protection Database (formerly CABPESTCD), Soil Science Database (formerly SOILCD), Veterinary Science Database (formerly VETCD)

Ag Biotech Net (www.agbiotechnet.com), Nutrition and Food Sciences Database (www.nutritionandfoodsciences.org), Animal Science Database (www.animalScience.com), DrylandScope (www.drylandscope.org), Forest Science Database (www.forestscience.info), The Essential Electronic Agricultural Library (www.teeal.org), Scopus (www.scopus.com)

 

Publication ethics / Ethical guidelines

Editorial Ethics and Integrity Policy

The journal is committed to promoting best editorial practices, ensuring the academic integrity of the works it publishes, and maintaining transparent, confidential, impartial, and respectful evaluation processes. These policies apply to authors, peer reviewers, members of the editorial team, and the Editorial Board.

 

Responsibilities of Authors

  1. Originality and Exclusivity: Authors must submit original, unpublished works that are not under concurrent consideration by any other publication. Furthermore, they must guarantee the veracity of the presented data, the appropriate use of sources, the correct attribution of ideas, data, images, testimonies, or third-party materials, and compliance with the journal's editorial guidelines. Copyrighted material (e.g., images, figures, tables, etc.) must not be included in the manuscript unless a formal license for use granted by the copyright holder is attached.
  2. Human Subjects and Ethics Clearances: When a manuscript derives from research involving fieldwork, interviews, testimonies, images, personal archives, communities, vulnerable groups, or sensitive information, authors are responsible for securing all necessary consents, authorizations, or ethical approvals. A statement must be provided within the document confirming that such informed consent was obtained and, if applicable, that approval was granted by an institutional ethics committee.
  3. Animal Research Protocols: When a manuscript derives from research involving animal subjects, a statement of compliance with animal welfare regulations is required, explicitly indicating the specific regulatory standard used as a reference (a general or vague declaration is unacceptable). If the institution has a bioethics committee, the corresponding authorization or protocol number must be included in the statement. The journal reserves the right to request a copy of this official document in the event of reasonable doubt, or during processes involving clarifications, withdrawals, or retractions. In such cases, failure to provide the official document will constitute grounds for manuscript withdrawal or retraction.
  4. Disclosures and Conflict of Interest: Authors must declare any real, potential, or apparent conflicts of interest, as well as funding sources or institutional support linked to the research, the availability or deposition of primary data, and the use of artificial intelligence pursuant to the guidelines established by the journal. They must also promptly notify the editorial team if they identify significant errors in a submitted or published text. The journal may request additional information whenever the content of the manuscript warrants it.
  • Prior Publication Criteria: Submitted manuscripts must not have been previously published or be currently under consideration for publication elsewhere. A work is considered previously published under the following criteria:
  • a. When the full text has been published by any means, whether print or electronic, in any language.
  • b. When multiple paragraphs from manuscripts previously published by at least one of the co-authors are incorporated into the text submitted to the journal.
  • c. When the manuscript submitted to the journal has already been published as part of the full-text proceedings (memorias en extenso) of a conference or academic event.
  • Citation and Plagiarism: Authors must properly cite all articles and documents referenced within the text and provide complete bibliographic details for all cited works, including the DOI. In-text citations to published works must be made whenever an author draws upon the ideas of others to ground their research. The journal does not tolerate plagiarism in any form, and its detection will result in the immediate rejection of the manuscript.
  • AI Compliance: Authors must strictly adhere to the journal's guidelines regarding the use of artificial intelligence and include the corresponding disclosure statement.
  •  

Responsibilities of the Editorial Team

  1. Fair Play and Non-Discrimination: The editorial team will conduct the processes of receipt, review, evaluation, and publication in strict accordance with the journal's regulations. Manuscripts will be evaluated solely on their academic relevance, quality, originality, and adherence to editorial criteria, without discrimination based on origin, gender, sexual orientation, religion, nationality, institutional affiliation, political stance, or any other personal status.
  2. Confidentiality and Objectivity: Information regarding received manuscripts will be treated with strict confidentiality and will only be shared with individuals directly involved in the editorial process. Anyone participating in editorial management must recuse themselves from intervening in cases involving a conflict of interest.
  • Quality Assurance: The work performed by the Editor-in-Chief and the Associate Editors will be guided by international publishing standards and a commitment to ensuring the quality of the published material. The Editor-in-Chief, with the support of the Associate Editors, is responsible for making the final decision to accept or reject a manuscript for publication. This decision will be based on peer-review reports and compliance with the journal’s editorial policies regarding content, scope, quality, and publication ethics.
  • Blind Review Integrity: The Editor commits to guaranteeing the confidentiality of the manuscript evaluation process. Given that a single-blind review system is utilized, the identity of the reviewers will not be disclosed to the authors.
  • Unpublished Material: Unpublished materials from a submitted manuscript shall not be used in the personal research of the Editor-in-Chief or the Associate Editors.
  • Ethical Decisions: Editors must make decisions aligned with the publication ethics of the journal and guarantee a fair, robust, and appropriate peer-review process.
  •  

Responsibilities of Peer Reviewers

  1. Constructive Evaluation: Peer reviewers must conduct critical, objective, respectful, confidential, and well-founded evaluations. Their observations should contribute to the improvement of the manuscript and assist the editorial team in making editorial decisions.
  • Confidentiality of Review: Reviewers must commit to maintaining the strict confidentiality of all information related to the manuscripts they evaluate and must ensure its proper and ethical use.
  • Scientific Objectivity: Reviewers must evaluate the manuscript with total adherence to objectivity and scientific criteria. Critiques must be constructive, providing authors with sufficient elements to improve their manuscripts under review.
  • Ethical Use of Insights: Ideas or insights obtained through the peer-review process must not be used to gain personal or professional advantage.
  • Conflict of Interest Recusal: Reviewers must not evaluate manuscripts in which they have conflicting interests.
  • Competence and Availability: Individuals who lack availability, sufficient thematic expertise, or who identify a conflict of interest must notify the editorial team promptly.
  • Reporting Misconduct: Reviewers must inform the editorial team if they detect signs of plagiarism, self-plagiarism, duplicate publication, data manipulation, inappropriate use of sources, or any other potential breach of academic integrity.
  •  

Conflicts of Interest

All stakeholders involved in the editorial process must declare any personal, academic, institutional, employment, financial, or other affiliations that could affect, or appear to affect, the impartiality of the evaluation or the editorial decision. When a conflict of interest is identified, the journal may replace reviewers, reassign the management of the manuscript, request the intervention of the Editorial Board, or adopt any measures necessary to safeguard the impartiality of the process.

 

Complaints, Appeals, and Allegations

The journal will address complaints, grievances, appeals against editorial decisions, or allegations related to potential breaches of academic integrity, provided they are submitted in writing, respectfully, and with due substantiation to the journal's official email address. Requests must state the reason for the grievance, identify the manuscript or publication involved, and provide the corresponding evidence. The editorial team will review each case confidentially and impartially, and may request clarifications from the involved parties or consult the Editorial Board when deemed necessary. The filing of an appeal does not imply an automatic reversal of an editorial decision. Resolutions will be communicated in writing and will be considered final and binding within the journal's procedures.

 

Plagiarism and Other Misconduct

Works submitted to Antrópica must be free of plagiarism, self-plagiarism, data fabrication or manipulation, duplicate publication, improper authorship (guest/ghost authorship), unauthorized use of materials, and the deliberate omission of sources. The journal may utilize similarity and plagiarism detection software, as well as specialized academic review. If misconduct is identified during the editorial process, the manuscript may be rejected or suspended until the situation is clarified. If the breach is detected post-publication, the journal will adopt the corresponding corrective measures.

 

Corrections and Retractions

The journal may publish corrections, clarifications, editorial notes, or retractions when significant errors, omissions, ethical issues, or information affecting the academic integrity of a published text are identified.

  • Corrections: Will be issued when the errors do not invalidate the core arguments of the work.
  • Retractions: Will be applied when serious misconduct is proven, such as plagiarism, data fabrication or manipulation, duplicate publication, improper authorship, lack of necessary ethical permissions, or any other behavior that compromises the validity or legitimacy of the publication.

Every correction or retraction will be evaluated by the editorial team and, when necessary, by the Editorial Board. The decision will be communicated to the authors and will be prominently published on the journal's website, directly linked to the original text.

Publishing standards 

The journal adheres to the Council of Science Editors recommendations

 

Metadata Policy

Statement of Quality and Standardization

The journal is committed to the generation, management, and curation of standardized metadata for each of the digital objects it publishes. Proper cataloging is fundamental to guaranteeing the visibility, retrievability, and interoperability of our scientific output in national and international academic information systems.

 

Applied Standards

To ensure compatibility with external systems and the infrastructure of the Autonomous University of Yucatán (UADY), our policy is based on the following standards:

 

• Metadata Schema: The journal uses the Dublin Core (DC) scheme, which is the international standard for describing digital resources.

• OAI-PMH Interoperability: All metadata is exposed through the OAI-PMH protocol (Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting), which allows the UADY Library Coordination systems and external repositories to automatically index our content. • Persistent Identifiers: The management of metadata associated with persistent identifiers (DOI) is guaranteed, linking the unique digital identity of each item with its descriptive information.

 

Minimum Metadata Elements

Every article published in the journal must include the following elements, in a mandatory and standardized format:

 

ELEMENT TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION

AUTHOR(S) Standardized names, preferably with an associated ORCID.

TITLE Full title, including versions in other languages (e.g., English).

ABSTRACT Structured abstract (in Spanish and English).

KEYWORDS Controlled terms or free language for indexing.

PUBLISHING DATA ISSN, journal name, volume, issue, year, and elocation ID.

IDENTIFIERS DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and direct access URL.

RIGHTS License agreement (e.g., Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0).

DOCUMENT TYPE Classification of the object (research article, review, note, etc.).

 

Interinstitutional Collaboration: UADY Library Coordination

By virtue of our close collaboration with the UADY Library Coordination, the editors commit to:

• Workflow: Facilitating the flow of metadata to the Institutional Repository and the university bibliographic catalog, allowing the journal's output to become part of the integrated UADY collection.

• Data Quality: Conducting periodic metadata audits to correct typographical errors, omissions of institutional affiliation, or inconsistencies in author standardization

 

Policy on the Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Scholarly Publishing

1. Introduction

The purpose of this policy is to promote the transparent and responsible use of AI. Consequently, this policy has been developed based on leading international benchmarks in publication ethics, notably the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), the UNESCO Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence, and the principles of the Heredia Declaration (2024) regarding the use of AI in scientific publishing.

 

2. Scope and Definitions

This policy applies to all stakeholders involved in the editorial process of UADY journals, including authors, peer reviewers, advisors, editorial boards or councils, and members of the editorial teams.

 

Generative AI is defined as technology capable of generating or transforming text, images, code, or data utilizing generative models, whether large language models, diffusion models for image, audio, or video, or other analogous systems. This is distinguished from routine support tools—such as spell and grammar checkers integrated into word processors and reference managers—the use of which does not require disclosure.

 

3. Guiding Principles

  • Author: The individual who has produced a scientific, literary, or artistic work. Article 12 of the Mexican Federal Copyright Law specifies that such status belongs exclusively to natural persons; therefore, AI cannot be considered an author or a copyright holder.
  • Transparency: The obligation of the author to declare any use of AI that extends beyond elementary linguistic correction.
  • Traceability: The detailed documentation of the tool utilized (name, version, developer or manufacturer, and, if applicable, the extension), the date, the purpose, and the specific sections of the manuscript where AI was employed, pursuant to the provisions of Section 4.5.
  • Responsibility and Human Oversight: All stakeholders participating in the editorial process are accountable for the originality and relevance of the content, including any content generated or assisted by AI.
  • Integrity: All manuscripts will be subjected to similarity detection software. Plagiarism, data or reference fabrication, and the dissemination of false information are strictly prohibited, regardless of whether the content was authored by a human or generated via AI.
  • Data Protection and Intellectual Property: Inputting personal data, confidential information, or third-party materials into any AI tool without the explicit authorization of the copyright holder is strictly prohibited.
  • Institutional Alignment: The use of AI within UADY journals must remain consistent with the University’s humanistic and intercultural mission. Specifically, it must safeguard linguistic and cultural diversity, including the Maya language, as well as the institution's commitment to multilingualism and human well-being.

 

4. Guidelines for Authors

4.1 Uses Not Requiring Disclosure

  • Supportive Spelling and Grammar Correction: For instance, correcting syntax, punctuation, or typographical errors without altering the underlying content or arguments. If the intervention substantively modifies the phrasing or the structural flow of ideas, it falls under Section 4.2 and must be disclosed.
  • Reference Management: Organizing citations and bibliographies using reference management software.
  • Minor Formatting Adjustments: Minor adjustments to formatting or citation style.
  • Translation: Translating the entirety or sections of the manuscript, provided a final review is conducted by the authors to guarantee that the original meaning is accurately preserved.
  • Substantive Textual Revision: Substantive rephrasing or reorganization of the wording and arguments.
  • Coding Support: Assisting in writing or generating code for data analysis purposes.

 

4.2 Permitted Uses Requiring Disclosure

 

4.3 Prohibited Uses

  • Intellectual Contribution: Generating original analyses, interpretations, or arguments that constitute the core intellectual contribution of authorship.
  • Core Drafting: Drafting, in whole or in part, the core sections of the manuscript without significant human intellectual contribution.
  • Fabrication: Fabricating data, results, or bibliographic references.
  • Visual Alteration: Generating or altering images, tables, or figures using AI in manuscripts submitted for evaluation, unless such output is the explicit object of study or forms a declared component of the methodology.
  • Deception: Simulating human authorship or concealing the true origin of the information.

 

4.4 Authorship and Citation

AI cannot be listed as an author or co-author, as it cannot assume legal responsibilities or obligations. Furthermore, it shall not be included in the reference list, given that it does not generate verifiable, original knowledge. When applicable, the tool must be mentioned within the disclosure statement, in accordance with the conventions of each specific discipline.

 

4.5 AI Use Disclosure Statement

Upon manuscript submission, authors must include an AI use disclosure statement immediately preceding the reference section, and reiterate this disclosure in the "Comments to the Editor" field on the journal platform. The statement must specify the name, version, developer or manufacturer, and, if applicable, the extension of the tool; the date of use; the purpose; the affected sections; and a confirmation that the authors reviewed and validated all content. If no generative AI was employed, this must be explicitly stated.

 

5. Guidelines for Peer Reviewers

  • Expert Judgment: The evaluation regarding publication, as well as any critiques and corrections, relies entirely on the professional judgment of the reviewer; AI cannot substitute for human peer review.
  • Confidentiality: Uploading manuscripts under evaluation—or excerpts thereof—into public or cloud-based AI tools is strictly prohibited, as this compromises unpublished, proprietary information.
  • Limited Assistive Use: AI is permissible solely for refining the language of the review report itself, provided that no manuscript content is exposed and its use is disclosed to the editorial team.
  • Honesty: Concealing the use of AI during the evaluation process undermines the transparency of peer review and constitutes ethical misconduct.
  • Human Decision-Making: Accepting, rejecting, or requesting revisions for a manuscript is the sole prerogative of qualified editors.
  • Support Tools: Automated tools may be utilized for non-decision-making tasks—such as similarity and originality screening or metadata management—subject to human oversight and review of the results.
  • Prohibitions: Generative AI shall not be used to draft decision letters, referee reports, or summaries of unpublished manuscripts.
  • Confidentiality: Manuscripts shall not be processed through AI tools that may inappropriately disclose identities or content; concealing the use of AI in editorial workflows constitutes ethical misconduct.
  • Originality Verification: Each journal will explicitly state on its website the specific similarity and AI detection software it utilizes, along with the standard protocol to be followed upon finding a discrepancy.

 

6. Guidelines for the Editorial Team

 

7. Consequences of Non-Compliance

The declared and responsible use of AI does not, by itself, constitute grounds for rejection. Conversely, omitting the disclosure or utilizing AI inappropriately may result—depending on the severity and in accordance with international best practices—in a request to correct or append the disclosure statement, immediate manuscript rejection at any stage of evaluation, retraction of the article if discovered post-publication, notification to the author's home institution in severe cases, or the removal of peer reviewers who fail to comply with these regulations.

 

8. Start of policy and Updates

This policy initiated in 2026 and will be periodically reviewed to remain aligned with technological advancements, guidelines from COPE and UNESCO, and evolving best practices in scholarly publishing.

 

References and Guiding Frameworks

Committee on Publication Ethics. (2021). COPE discussion document: Artificial intelligence (AI) in decision making. https://doi.org/10.24318/9kvAgrnJ

 

Committee on Publication Ethics. (2023). Authorship and AI tools. https://publicationethics.org/guidance/cope-position/authorship-and-ai-tools

 

Penabad-Camacho, L., Penabad-Camacho, M. A., Mora-Campos, A., Cerdas-Vega, G., Morales-López, Y., Ulate-Segura, M., Méndez-Solano, A., Nova-Bustos, N., Vega-Solano, M. F., & Castro-Solano, M. M. (2024). Declaración de Heredia: Principios sobre el uso de inteligencia artificial en la edición científica. Revista Electrónica Educare, 28(S), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.15359/ree.28-S.19967

 

Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación. (2025). Amparo directo 6/2025. https://transparencia-ciudadana.scjn.gob.mx/resoluciones-relevantes-de-la-SCJN/derechos-digitales/ad-6-2025

 

UNESCO. (2022). Recomendación sobre la ética de la inteligencia artificial. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000381137_spa

 

Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán. (2026). Plan de Desarrollo Institucional 2026–2040. https://pdi.uady.mx/planes-desarrollo/PDI2026

 

Annex: AI Use Disclosure Statement Templates

 

Affirmative Statement (Example)

I/We declare that the tool [name, version, and developer] was utilized on [DD/MM/YYYY] during the preparation of this manuscript for the purpose of [purpose] in the [section(s)] section. The entirety of the content was validated, and I/we assume full responsibility for its accuracy, originality, and relevance.

 

Negative Statement (Example)

I/We declare that no generative artificial intelligence tools were employed in the preparation of this manuscript.