Biomass and sugar production of sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) for different sowing dates in Veracruz, Mexico

Sergio Uribe-Gómez, Germán Partida-Sedas, Rosa Laura Rebolledo-García, María Guadalupe Aguilar-Uscanga, Noé Montes-García

Abstract


Background. The most commonly used raw materials for ethanol production are maize (Zea mays L.) and sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.). A specie that is gaining importance because of its comparative advantages over other energy crops is sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench). The seasonality of production, which limits the continuous supply of sweet sorghum to the industry for ethanol production, is one of the limitations of this crop. Objective. To evaluate the biomass and sugar production of sweet sorghum genotypes for different sowing dates in Veracruz, Mexico conditions. Methodology. The development of ten genotypes was determined during the autumn-winter (October 2013), winter-spring (February 2014) and spring-summer (April 2014) cycles. Three genotypes were also tested on five planting dates: June 19th, July 1st, August 1st, September 1st, and October 2nd, at the Cotaxtla Experimental Station of the Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias (INIFAP), located in the municipality of Medellín de Bravo, Veracruz, México. Results. Sweet sorghum developed in all cropping seasons, but the highest productivity was obtained in the spring-summer. Stem biomass, sugar concentration, juice volume, and sugar production were highest in June, July, and August, following planting. As the planting date was later, the values decreased. Implications. The optimal planting date for sweet sorghum cultivation in the state of Veracruz was identified. This information will be helpful for producers to obtain higher biomass yields and for the ethanol industry to plan sweet sorghum production as a complementary raw material to sugarcane. Conclusions. The optimum sweet sorghum planting period for producing biomass and sugars under Veracruz, Mexico, conditions is during June, July, and August.

Keywords


harvest seasonality; plant morphology; sugar concentration

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alagarswamy, G., Reddy, D.M. and Swaminathan, G., 1998. Durations of the photoperiod-sensitive and insensitive phases of time to panicle initiation in sorghum. Field Crops Research, [e-journal] 55, pp.1-10. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(97)00039-7

Almodares, A. and Hadi, R., 2009. Production of bioethanol from sweet sorghum: A review. African Journal of Agricultural Research, [e-journal] 4, pp.772-780. https://dx.doi.org/10.5897/AJAR.9000567

Balat, M. and Balat, H., 2009. Recent trends in global production and utilization of bioethanol fuel. Applied Energy, [e-journal] 86, pp. 2273-2282. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.03.015

Burks, P.S., 2012. Assessing Maturity in Sweet Sorghum Hybrids and its Role in Daily Biomass Supply. Master's thesis, Texas A&M University. Available at: https://oaktrust.library.tamu.edu/bitstream/handle/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2012-05-10886/BURKS-THESIS.pdf [Accessed 18.11.2024].

Burks, P.S., Felderhoff, T.J., Viator, H.P. and Rooney, W.L., 2013. The influence of hybrid maturity and planting date on sweet sorghum productivity during a harvest season. Agronomy Journal, [e-journal] 105, pp.263-267. https://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj2012.0317

Capecchi, L., Nissen, L., Modesto, M., Girolamo, G. Di, Cavani, L. and Barbanti, L., 2017. Crop factors influencing ethanol production from sorghum juice and bagasse. Energies, [e-journal] 10(7), pp.940. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/en10070940

Chavez, J.C., Ganjegunte, G.K., Jeong, J., Rajan, N., Zapata, S.D., Ruiz-Alvarez, O. and Enciso, J., 2022. Radiation use efficiency and agronomic performance of biomass sorghum under different sowing dates. Agronomy, [e-journal] 12(6), pp.1252. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12061252

Cisneros-López, Ma. E., García-Montes, N., Aguilar-Uscanga Ma. G., Uribe-Gómez, S. y Rebolledo-García R. L., 2018. Sorgos dulces para la producción de azúcares: RB-Pirulí, RB-Cañaveral y RB-Tehua. Folleto Técnico No. MX-0-310301-45-03-13-09-71. Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales Agrícolas y Pecuarias. Centro de Investigación Regional del Noreste. Campo Experimental Río Bravo, Río Bravo, Tamaulipas.

Clerget, B., Dingkuhn, M., Chantereau, J., Hemberger, J., Louarnb, G. and Vaksmann, M., 2004. Does panicle initiation in tropical sorghum depend on day-to-day change in photoperiod? Field Crops Research, [e-journal] 88, pp.21–37. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2003.11.008

Clerget, B., Rattunde, H.F.W., Dagnoko, S. and Chantereau, J., 2007. An easy way to assess photoperiod sensitivity in sorghum: Relationship of the vegetative-phase duration and photoperiod sensitivity. Journal of SAT Agricultural Research, 3, pp.1-3.

Erickson, J.E., Helsel, Z.R., Woodard, K.R., Vendramini, J.M.B., Wang, Y., Sollenberger, L.E. and Gilbert, R.A., 2011. Planting date affects biomass and brix of sweet sorghum grown for biofuel across Florida. Agronomy Journal, [e-journal] 103, pp.1827-1833. https://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj2011.0176

Han, K.J., Alison, M.W., Pitman, W.D., Day, D.F, Kim, M. and Madsen, L., 2012. Planting date and harvest maturity impact on biofuel feedstock productivity and quality of sweet sorghum grown under temperate Louisiana conditions. Agronomy Journal, [e-journal] 104, pp.1618-1624. https://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj2012.0213

Houx, J.H. and Fritschi, F.B., 2015. Influence of late planting on light interception, radiation use efficiency and biomass production of four sweet sorghum cultivars. Industrial Crops and Products, [e-journal] 76, pp. 62-68. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.06.036

México, 2015. Situación climatológica e hidrológica en 2015. [pdf] Comisión Nacional del Agua (CONAGUA). Available at: https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/101514/Situacio_n_hidrometeorolo_gica_MARZO_06_2015.pdf [Accessed 5 August 2025].

Naoura, G., Emendack, Y., Sawadogo, N., Djirabaye, N., Tabo, R., Laza, H. and Atchozou, E.A., 2023. Assessment of photoperiod sensitivity and the effect of sowing date on dry-season sorghum cultivars in Southern Chad. Agronomy, [e-journal] 13(3) p. 932. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13030932

Paul, C.L., 1990. Agronomía del sorgo. Traducido del Ingles por C.L. Paul and Ma.G. López-Abdelrague. El Salvador, C.A: Centro de Tecnología Agrícola (CENTA).

Prasad, S., Singh, A. and Joshi, H.C., 2007. Ethanol production from sweet sorghum syrup for utilization as automotive fuel in India. Energy and Fuels, [e-journal] 21 (4), pp. 2415-2420. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ef060328z

Ramírez-Jaramillo, G., Lozano-Contreras, M.G. and Ramírez-Silva, J.H., 2020. Agroclimatic conditions for growing Sorghum bicolor L. Moench, under irrigation conditions in Mexico. Open Access Library Journal, [e-journal] 7, pp. 1-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1106423

Rao, S.S., Patil, J.V., Prasad, P.V.V., Reddy, D.C.S., Mishra, J.S., Umakanth, A.V., Reddy, B.V.S. and Kumar, A.A., 2013. Sweet sorghum planting effects on stalk yield and sugar quality in semi-arid tropical environment. Agronomy Journal, 105(5), pp.1458-1465. https://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj2013.0156

Reddy, B.V.S, Kumar, A.A. and Ramesh, S., 2007. Sweet sorghum: A water saving bio-energy crop. In: ICRISAT (International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics), International conference on linkages between energy and water management for agriculture in developing countries. Patancheru, India, 29-30 January. Hyderabad: ICRISAT. Available at: https://oar.icrisat.org/4835/ [Accessed 11.11.2024].

Reddy, B.V.S., Reddy, P.S., Sadananda, A.R, Dinakaran, E., Kumar, A.A., Deshpande, S.P, Rao, P.S., Sharma, H.C., Sharma, R., Krishnamurthy, L. and Patil, J.V., 2012. Postrainy season sorghum: Constraints and breeding approaches. Journal of SAT Agricultural Research, 10, pp. 1-12.

Reddy, B.V.S, Srinivasa-Rao, P., Ashok-Kumar, A., Sanjana-Reddy P, Parthasarathy-Rao,P., Sharma, K. K., Blummel, M. and Ravinder-Reddy, Ch., 2009. Sweet sorghum as a biofuel crop: Where are we now? In Proceeding of the 6th International Biofuels Conference (pp. 193-202). [pdf] International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT). Available at: https://oar.icrisat.org/3613/1/Sweet_sorghum_as_a_biofuel_crop_where_are_we_now.pdf [Accessed 5 August 2025].

Sanon, M., Hoogenboom, G., Traoré, S.B., Sarr, B., Garcia, A.G., Somé, L. and Roncoli, C., 2014. Photoperiod sensitivity of local millet and sorghum varieties in West Africa. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, [e-journal] 68, pp.29– 39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2013.11.004

SAS Institute Inc., 2008. SAS/STAT® 9.2 user’s guide. Cary, nC: SAS Institute Inc.

Shinde, M.S., Mutkule, B.R., Gaikwad, A.R., Dalvi, U.S. and Gadakh, S.R., 2013. Photoperiod sensitivity studies in sweet sorghum. Journal of Academia and Industrial Research 1 (8), pp. 696-699.

Teetor, V.H., Duclos, D.V., Wittenberg, E.T., Young, K., Chawhuaymak, J., Riley, M.R. and Ray, D.T., 2011. Effects of planting date on sugar and ethanol yield of sweet sorghum grown in Arizona. Industrial Crops and Products, [e-journal] 34 (2), pp.1293–1300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2010.09.010

Tovignan, T.K., Fonceka, D., Ndoye, I., Cisse, N. and Luquet, D., 2016a. The sowing date and post-flowering water status affect the sugar and grain production of photoperiodic, sweet sorghum through the regulation of sink size and leaf area dynamics. Field Crops Research, [e-journal] 192, pp.67–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2016.04.015

Tovignan, T.K., Luquet, D., Fonceka, D., Ndoye, I., Trouche, G. and Cisse, N., 2016b. Assessment of the variability of Senegalese landraces for phenology and sugar yield components to broaden the genetic pool of multi-purpose sorghum. Plant Genetic Resources, [e-journal] 14(2), pp.121-131. https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1479262115000155

Xuan, T.D., Phuong, N.T., Khang, D.T. and Khanh, T.D., 2015. Influence of sowing times, densities, and soils to biomass and ethanol yield of sweet sorghum. Sustainability, [e-journal] 7 pp.11657-11678. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su70911657




URN: http://www.revista.ccba.uady.mx/urn:ISSN:1870-0462-tsaes.v28i3.64385

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.56369/tsaes.6438

Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2025 SERGIO URIBE-GÓMEZ

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.