ENERGY EFFICIENCY IN AGROFORESTRY PARCELS IN ALLUVIAL MINING AREAS UNDER ECOLOGICAL SUCCESSION IN THE MUNICIPALITY OF EL BAGRE - ANTIOQUIA (COLOMBIA)

Juan Antonio Espinosa-Alzate, Leonardo Alberto Rios-Osorio

Abstract


Background. The agroforestry parcels are processes of ecological succession that, through technical activities applied to the soil, the areas intervened by the intensive mining operation of deep alluvium are recovered and adapted to biodiverse areas that transform the intervened landscape into productive and environmentally healthy areas with a very marked concept towards family farming. Objective. To analyze the energy efficiency in the production of agroforestry plots located in alluvial mining areas in processes of ecological succession, in the municipality of El Bagre - Antioquia. Methodology. A field evaluation was carried out in the "agroforestry parcels" located in the municipality of El Bagre, department of Antioquia - Colombia. A sustainability analysis was carried out through the evaluation of indicators and complementary methods such as the rapid evaluation of biodiversity (Institute for Plant Health Research - INISAV, Havana, Cuba), measurement of energy flows and uses, and the application of the Shannon index, as indicators of diversity. Results. The findings of this research show the level of energy efficiency of each studied agroforestry parcel and the agroecological characteristics, in terms of sustainability and resilience of the restored areas in the agricultural context of the region. Implications. Defining the recovery process of other agroforestry parcels as a successful experience based on the evaluation of agroecology principles, that is, relations of production, society and culture, among other dimensions, can become a tool applicable to the evaluation of recovery processes of ecosystems intervened and degraded by extractive mining practices and support agricultural planning processes. Conclusions. These conservation and recovery processes of soils affected by mining may show positive transformations that respond to ecological principles, and this can be demonstrated through the evaluation of sustainability indicators.

Keywords


Agroecology; agroforestry parcels; biodiversity; complex systems; energy efficiency; ecological restoration.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bernal, F., Lopera, H.M., Mercado, R. and Lopera H., 1972. Estudio socio económico del Oriente Antioqueño. Bogotá: ICA-Departamento de ciencias sociales- programa nacional de sociología rural.

Campos, P. and Naredo, J., 1980. La energía en los sistemas agrarios. Agricultura y Sociedad, 15, pp. 17-113.

Denoia, J. and Montico, S., 2010. Balance de energía en cultivos hortícolas a campo en Rosario (Santa Fe, Argentina) Ciencia, Docencia y Tecnología, 21(41), pp. 145-157.

Devendra, C., 2007. Small Farm Systems to Feed Hungry Asia. Outlook on Agriculture, 36(1), pp. 7-20. https://doi.org/10.5367/000000007780223641

Forero, J., 2003. Economía Campesina y sistema alimentario en Colombia: aportes para la discusión sobre seguridad alimentaria. Bogotá: Editorial Javeriana.

Funes-Monzote, F., 2009. Agricultura con futuro: La alternativa agroecológica para Cuba. Matanzas (Cuba): Centro de Investigación Indio Hatuey.

Gliessman, S., 2000. Agroecology: ecological processes in sustainable agriculture. California: CRC Lewis publishers.

Gobernación de Antioquia., 2009. Informe especial planes municipales de desarrollo subregión del Bajo Cauca vs plan departamental de desarrollo. Medellín: Contraloría General de Antioquia.

Gobernación de Antioquia., 2022. Anuario Estadístico de Antioquia. Medellín: Departamento Administrativo de Planeación.

Martínez, A., Leyva, A., 2014. La biomasa de los cultivos en el agroecosistema. Sus beneficios agroecológicos. Cultivos Tropicales, 35(1), pp. 11-20.

Moonen, A. and Barberi, P., 2008. Functional biodiversity: An agroecosystem approach. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 127, 7-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2008.02.013

Salmerón, A., Geada, G. and Fagilde M., 2017. Propuesta de un índice de diversidad funcional. Aplicación a un bosque semideciduo micrófilo de Cuba Oriental. Revista Bosque, 38(3), pp. 457-466. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0717-92002017000300003

Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Alimentación y la Agricultura (FAO), 2015. Desarrollo de cadenas de valor alimentarias sostenibles: Principios rectores. Roma: FAO.

Pimentel, D., Williamson, S., Alexander, C., González, O., Kontak, C. and Mulkey, S., 2008. Reducing Energy Inputs in the US Food System. Human Ecology, 36: 459-471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-008-9184-3

Programa de las Naciones Unidas Para el Desarrollo (PNUD), 2011. Colombia Rural. Razones para la esperanza. Informe Nacional de Desarrollo Humano. Bogotá: INDH-PNUD.

Singh, S., Singh, S., Pannu, C.J. and Mittal, J.P., 1996. Fertilizer energy use and crop yield relationships for wheat in the Punjab ecosystems. Energy Conversion and Management, 37(10), pp. 1547-1553. https://doi.org/10.1016/0196-8904(95)00350-9

Vázquez, L., Veitia, M., Fernández, M., Jiménez, J. and Jiménez, S., 2009. Diagnóstico rápido de la ocurrencia de plagas en sistemas agrícolas de Cuba por eventos extremos de cambios en el clima. Revista Brasileira de Agroecología, 4(2), pp. 2149-2152.

Velásquez, J.C. and Mata, B., 2008. Desarrollo endógeno campesino: Análisis, crítica y perspectiva. Chapingo (México): Universidad Autónoma de Chapingo, Centro Interdisciplinario de Investigación y Servicio para el Medio Rural.




URN: http://www.revista.ccba.uady.mx/urn:ISSN:1870-0462-tsaes.v27i2.47904

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.56369/tsaes.4790



Copyright (c) 2024 Juan Antonio Espinosa-Alzate, Leonardo Alberto Rios-Osorio

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.